neo_0617
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit neo_0617's Xanga Site!

Name: neo_0617
Country: Hong Kong
Birthday: 3/3/1987
Gender: Male


Interests: sleeping, reading
Expertise: photography
Occupation: Student
Industry: Engineering


Message: message me
Website: visit my website
MSN: neo_0617@hotmail.com
ICQ: 166478362


Member Since: 9/2/2004

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
~~RC 2003-2004 S.5 Graduates~~
previous - random - next

~~ RCSA 04-05 ~~
previous - random - next

04~05 S.6 Raimondians
previous - random - next

/*CPEG @ HKUST */
previous - random - next

流川瘋
previous - random - next

~VERTEX, House II SA., HKUSTSU~
previous - random - next

\*~CPEG O'Camp 2006 !! We are on FIRE !!~*/
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Thursday, January 31, 2008

食飯 vs tue/thu coruses

COMP201 => 食早餐 / 遲起身 (0900-1020)
COMP271 L1/SOSC146 => 食BRUNCH (1030-1200)
COMP231 L1/ELEC214 L1 => 食LUNCH (1200-1320)
COMP231 L2/SOSC113 => 食遲LUNCH (1330-1450)
COMP271 L2/ELEC214 L2 => 食TEA (1500-1620)
COMP361/ELEC315 => 食遲TEA(1630-1800)

today's hell
COMP201/SOSC146/ELEC214 L1/COMP231 L2/COMP271 L2/COMP361/COMP201 LA1B
0900-1900 non-stop


Wednesday, January 30, 2008

從鷹王反應看相片真偽

forward的, 原post係呢度

膠文一篇,純粹發下up瘋

其實由鷹王同當事人反應,已經可以推斷到d相既真偽#hoho#

鷹王一開始選擇報警係騎虎難下,因為張相實在太真,+上太多人信張相係堅料:P
如果佢地唔報警,即係默認,所以佢地報警+高調出聲明(用法律黎壓你),主要係用黎表明清白,同埋減慢照片係網上既流傳速度 #hehe#
而大部份報紙係第二日都明確地表示張相係假野(唔知基於咩原因啦),而大眾判斷亦基於報紙既誤導而選擇相信o個d係假相#ng#
但係佢地(鷹王同報紙)算少左一步,佢地應該諗住當初發圖o個條友係得一張相佢地冇諗過原來條友有咁多貨係手,條友一受刺激,即刻upload set連圖上網,佢咁做用意好明顯,係用黎表明第一張相既真確性,事件發展到呢到,鷹王會選擇低調處理事件,最起碼唔會好似第一日咁高調報警,因為佢地驚再刺激條友,會有更多旗下女星既性愛照片被曝光(唔知對方手上有幾多籌碼)[shocking] :~(

事件暫時極其量受影響既都只係影響鷹王一個藝人,佢地會盡量淡化事件已挽救事主形象,如果失敗,大不了咪放棄佢,但係如果再刺激發相人,一陣一個唔該爆埋其他女藝人既相出黎,咁情況就難以控制,所以鷹王暫時會以靜制動,靜觀其變<IMG height=15 src=

睇到呢到,其實我已經覺得d相好大可能係堅料,從鷹王角度黎睇,如果d相係流,鷹王一定會企硬再次高調澄清,而唔係好似而家咁被動,而家鷹王似係驚左放相條友[shocking]
從放相既人黎睇,如果今次純粹係惡作劇,key假相放上網戲弄一下事主,咁當鷹王出聲明表+報警當日應該會立即嚇到鳩縮,唔會再放連圖上網,佢放得連圖上網,就係為左證明第一張相既真確性,即係有心玩大佢#kill# #kill# #kill#

我地再睇睇鷹王方面既說法,根據頭x日報既報導,鷹王表明相片屬移花接木,鍾小姐並冇睇過以上相片,我心諗,張相係真係假,只有當事人先知,連當事人都未睇過,點解鷹王就一口認定係假相?可見鷹王內部已決定,無論張相係真係假都好,一概否認fuck

再回想陳先生既聲明,佢向報紙表明,一切只是惡作劇,我想,我同你扑野影相,再將d相放上網俾人欣賞係惡作劇,我將你個頭key落av男優度再放上網都係惡作劇,咁即係點?如果陳生真係俾人屈既,我相信以佢既性格一定會用一大堆英文粗口黎問候記者+矢口否認,而家佢屬進退兩難,如果佢否認,而d相又俾人check到係真既,佢以後可以係香港消失,另一方面,而家佢又唔可以承認自己係相中主角,所以唯有答係惡作劇呢d無稜兩可既答案,風波中另一主角謝太亦發聲明,同樣無否定相片真偽
再加上陳先生已出走香港........

我既廢話講完啦:o)


Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Sticky notes about video codec

Contemporary video standard & codec implementation on PC
MPEG4 Part 2 aka "ASP" = DivX / XviD / 3ivX / Nero Digital / WMV7 / WMV8 / Quicktime 6
MPEG4 Part 10 aka "AVC" / "H264" = H264 / AVC1 / x264 / Quicktime 7
VC-1 = WMV9 / WMV9 Professional / WMV9 Advanced / WVC1
so actually you can say VC-1 is an "ASP" derivative ..
but throwing a VC-1 stream to an "ASP" player would not work

RMVB ....
remember they ALL came with a "slight" modification
RV10 / RV13 = H263
RV20 = H263 too
RV30 = H263 + early draft of H264
RV40 = H264
now you know why RMVB sux :)

and for consumer products ...
DVD
MPEG2 MP@ML (Main Profile @ Main Level)
*MAX* 720x480 / 720x576 @ 15Mbps
SDTV aka "標清" should also follow the same standard here ..

HD-DVD / Blu-ray
for VC-1 (most of them are on HD-DVD)
advanced @ L3 (?) (<- because no people would care anyway, H264 perform much better)
for H264 (most of them are on Blu-ray)
high @ L4.1 for HD content (1920x1080 or 1280x720)
high @ L3.1 for SD content (720x480)

DXVA issue
if you need DXVA aka "硬體解碼" HD content on your computer
be sure to use correct profile & level specified for HD-DVD / Blu-ray
otherwise it WON'T work and fall back to software rendering,
which it requires a decent amount of raw CPU power

most HD video available on the web ARE NOT DXVA friendly
they are most likely encoded as high @ L5.1,
which is the strictly maximum of the H264 specification

GPU manufacturers (nvidia & ati) & codec makers (cyberlink) prefer to stick to the HD-DVD / Blu-ray spec,
so they only allow anything less than the standard
that's why you won't get any DXVA when playing these files

although retrofitting would work in most cases (which it only changed the header of the file),
ultimately you would hit into a hard issue of DPB overflow,
especially on the less "fortunate" one, 1080p
SO MOVIE MAKERS PLEASE STICK TO STANDARD OR ELSE WE NEED TO TRANSCODE ALL FILES

煩到hihi


Reading of the day 23/01/2008

Cause of RROD

...... & response


我要reg course啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊


Tuesday, January 01, 2008

除夕已經有一份新年禮物 ...

ELEC果然係派grade ...
254唔好爛grade就得
fox



<< Previous 5 | Next 5 >>